Pressure Grows for Witnesses in Trial  01/28 06:57

   President Donald Trump's legal team is raising a broad-based attack on the 
impeachment case against him even as it mostly brushes past allegations in a 
new book that could undercut a key defense argument at his Senate trial.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Donald Trump's legal team is raising a 
broad-based attack on the impeachment case against him even as it mostly 
brushes past allegations in a new book that could undercut a key defense 
argument at his Senate trial.

   Former national security adviser John Bolton writes in a manuscript that 
Trump wanted to withhold military aid from Ukraine until it committed to 
helping with investigations into Democratic rival Joe Biden. That assertion 
matters because Trump and his lawyers have repeatedly insisted that he never 
tied the suspension of security aid to political investigations.

   The revelation clouded White House hopes for a swift end to the impeachment 
trial, as Democrats demanded witnesses and some Republicans expressed openness 
to the idea. It also distracted from hours of arguments Monday from Trump's 
lawyers, who declared anew that no witness has testified to direct knowledge 
that Trump's delivery of aid was contingent on investigations into Democrats. 
Bolton appeared poised to say exactly that if summoned by the Senate.

   "We deal with transcript evidence, we deal with publicly available 
information," attorney Jay Sekulow said. "We do not deal with speculation."

   Trump is charged with abusing his presidential power by asking Ukraine's 
leader to help investigate Biden at the same time his administration was 
withholding hundreds of millions of dollars in security aid. A second charge 
accuses Trump of obstructing Congress in its probe.

   Republicans are to conclude their arguments Tuesday.

   On Monday, Trump's attorneys, including high-profile lawyers Ken Starr and 
Alan Dershowitz, launched a historical, legal and political attack on the 
entire impeachment process. They said there was no basis to remove Trump from 
office, defended his actions as appropriate and assailed Biden, who is 
campaigning for the Democratic nomination to oppose Trump in November.

   Former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi devoted her presentation to Biden 
and his son Hunter, who served on the board of a Ukraine gas company when his 
father was leading the Obama administration's diplomatic dealings with Kyiv. 
The legal team argued that Trump had legitimate reasons to be suspicious of the 
younger Biden's business dealings and concerned about corruption in Ukraine and 
that, in any event, he ultimately released the aid without Ukraine committing 
to investigations the Republican president wanted.

   Trump has sought, without providing evidence, to implicate the Bidens in the 
kind of corruption that has long plagued Ukraine. Though anti-corruption 
advocates have raised concerns, there has been no evidence of wrongdoing by 
either the former vice president or his son.

   Democrats say Trump released the money only after a whistleblower submitted 
a complaint about the situation.

   Starr, whose independent counsel investigation into President Bill Clinton 
resulted in his impeachment --- he was acquitted by the Senate --- bemoaned 
what he said was an "age of impeachment." Impeachment, he said, requires an 
actual crime and a "genuine national consensus" that the president must go. 
Neither exists here, Starr said.

   "It's filled with acrimony and it divides the country like nothing else," 
Starr said of impeachment. "Those of us who lived through the Clinton 
impeachment understand that in a deep and personal way."

   Dershowitz, the final speaker of the evening, argued that impeachable 
offenses require criminal-like conduct --- a view largely rejected by legal 
scholars. He said "nothing in the Bolton revelations, even if true, would rise 
to the level of an abuse of power or an impeachable offense."

   "Purely non-criminal conduct, including abuse of power and obstruction of 
Congress, are outside the range of impeachable offenses," Dershowitz said.

   Elizabeth Warren, a presidential campaigner like Biden but also a Senate 
juror, told reporters she found Dershowitz's arguments "nonsensical."

   Even as defense lawyers laid out their case as planned, it was clear 
Bolton's book had scrambled the debate over whether to seek witnesses. Trump's 
legal team has rejected Bolton's account, and Trump himself denied it. 

   "I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations 
into Democrats, including the Bidens," Trump tweeted. "If John Bolton said 
this, it was only to sell a book."

   Republican senators face a pivotal moment. Pressure is mounting for at least 
four to buck GOP leaders and form a bipartisan majority to force the issue. 
Republicans hold a 53-47 majority.

   "John Bolton's relevance to our decision has become increasingly clear," GOP 
Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah told reporters. Sen. Susan Collins of Maine said she 
has always wanted "the opportunity for witnesses" and the report about Bolton's 
book "strengthens the case."

   At a private GOP lunch, Romney made the case for calling Bolton, according 
to a person unauthorized to discuss the meeting and granted anonymity. 

   Other Republicans, including Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, said if Bolton 
is called, they will demand reciprocity to hear from at least one of their 
witnesses. Some Republicans want to call the Bidens. 

   Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell didn't know about Bolton's book, his 
office said. But the GOP leader appeared unmoved by news of the Bolton book. 
His message at the lunch, said Indiana GOP Sen. Mike Braun, was, "Take a deep 
breath, and let's take one step at a time."

   Once the president's team wraps up its arguments, senators have 16 hours for 
written questions to both sides. By late in the week, they are expected to hold 
a vote on whether or not to hear from any witnesses.

   While Democrats say Bolton's revelations are reminiscent of the Watergate 
drip-drip-drip of new information, Republicans are counting on concerns 
subsiding by the time senators are asked to vote. They are being told that if 
there is agreement to summon Bolton, the White House will resist, claiming 
executive privilege. 

   That would launch a weekslong court battle that could drag out the 
impeachment trial, a scenario some GOP senators would rather avoid.

   Trump and his lawyers have argued repeatedly that Democrats are using 
impeachment to try to undo the results of the last presidential election and 
drive Trump from office.

   Democrats, meanwhile, say Trump's refusal to allow administration officials 
to testify only reinforces that the White House is hiding evidence. The White 
House has had Bolton's manuscript for about a month, according to a letter from 
Bolton's attorney.

   Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said: "We're all staring a White 
House cover-up in the face."

   Rep. Adam Schiff, who leads the House prosecution team, called Bolton's 
account a test for the senators.

   "I don't know how you can explain that you wanted a search for the truth in 
this trial and say you don't want to hear from a witness who had a direct 
conversation about the central allegation in the articles of impeachment," 
Schiff said on CNN. 

   Bolton's account was first reported by The New York Times and was confirmed 
to The Associated Press by a person familiar with the manuscript. "The Room 
Where It Happened; A White House Memoir" is to be released March 17.

   Joe Biden, campaigning in Iowa, said he sees no reason for testimony by him 
or his son.

   "I have nothing to defend. This is all a game, even if they bring me up," he 
told reporters. "What is there to defend? This is all -- the reason he's being 
impeached is because he tried to get a government to smear me and they 
wouldn't. Come on."


(KR)